| 
     | 
     | 
          
     
    Jewish Public Forum Archive
    Welcome to the
    Jewish Public Forum Archive, where you will find materials
    published under the auspices of the Jewish Public Forum, including articles by, and
    interviews with, Forum participants. 
    For more information about the Jewish Public Forum, click here.
    To access the Jewish Public Forum Archive, click here.
     
       
     
    Passover in East Timor
     
    By Shepard Forman
    (Dr. Shepard Forman directs the Center on International Cooperation at New York
    University. He is active in the Jewish Public Forum at CLAL, a new think tank that brings
    together leading figures from the media, business, politics and academia to think about
    the Jewish future. To learn more about the Jewish Public Forum, click here. ) 
     
    Twenty-five years ago, my family and I took leave of anthropological field work in East
    Timor to spend Passover in Australia, where we participated in a seder hosted by the
    Israeli Ambassador in Canberra. By chance, we sat across the table from an elderly couple,
    part of the Jewish diaspora from China, who remembered my wifes parents and
    grandparents from there and conveyed their memories to us and our young children. Coupled
    with the Seder and the reading of the Haggadah, I was reminded of what to me is central to
    Jewish life--a common history, a shared heritage, and the strength and resilience that has
    come from centuries of suffering and recovery.  
     
    East Timor in 1974 was just beginning to experience the promise of Portuguese
    de-colonization embodied in the "carnation revolution" that ended the Salazar
    dictatorship. Three fledgling political parties emerged within the colony to debate its
    future, a choice between continued allegiance to Portugal, independence and accession to
    Indonesian rule. With independence clearly in the ascendance, the Portuguese withdrew from
    East Timor, leaving their guns and garrisons at the disposal of independence partisans,
    and armed conflict soon ensued. Nearly routed, the pro-Indonesian party
    "invited" Indonesian intervention that occurred massively and brutally in
    December 1975. In the course of the invasion and the subsequent Indonesian occupation,
    over 200,000 East Timorese died. The remainder of the population was removed from their
    ancestral homelands in the mountains and relocated in "strategic hamlets" along
    the malarial-ridden coast where they have lived ever since on the meager largesse of
    Indonesia. Lands and jobs were distributed to transmigrants, those Indonesians
    transplanted from overpopulated islands to the west, while the East Timorese were forced
    to assimilate to Indonesian culture and language. 
     
    Animist by tradition, divided into 26 distinct ethno-lingustic groups, the East Timorese
    had been isolated from neighboring Indonesian islands and their Dutch colonial masters
    during the 400 years of Portuguese rule. Although only a few spoke Portuguese or adhered
    to the Catholic Church during the colonial period, they converted in huge numbers after
    the Indonesian invasion to seek the protection of Bishop Carlos Ximenes Belo, the
    co-winner with independence leader Jose Ramos Horta of the 1996 Nobel Peace Prize for his
    efforts on behalf of the East Timorese people. A proud and brave people, they have endured
    half a millenium of cruel and despotic oppression. Resistance to the Indonesian invasion
    was inevitable, and it has been constant--in daily life, in a simmering mountain
    insurgency, in occasional street demonstrations, and through prayer. 
     
    Hidden from public view through years of Indonesian closure, ignored by the great powers
    who sought to appease Indonesia or profit from its markets, overshadowed by Cold War
    concerns and the struggle over apartheid, the East Timorese have struggled valiantly for
    their survival and their freedom.  
     
    My family and I returned to Quelicai in the Spring of 1974, the small administrative post
    on Mate Bian mountain inhabited by a largely Melanesian people known as the Makassae. We
    came with the Passover spirit of renewal and a copy of the colorful Haggadah from our
    Canberra seder. I still recall with wonder the afternoon at my desk when my elderly
    teacher, a Makassae sage and ritual leader known as Nanaie Nau Naha spotted our
    Haggadah. Unable to read or write in any language, he was struck by the drawings of our
    ancients, depicted, not unlike himself, barefoot and in simple cloths. In leafing through
    the book, he could not help but notice the different typefaces that described in Hebrew
    and in English our exodus from Egypt.  
     
    "What is this?" he asked, and I explained that it was the history of my people
    told in our ritual and our daily language at a meal designed to pass on our story from
    generation to generation. Could I write out their history in their ritual and daily
    language, he asked, so that his son would know what it means to be Makassae? I could, I
    said, recalling the linguistic course in which I had learned the art of phonetic script.  
     
    Nanaie aborted my lesson that day and did not return for most of that week. When he
    did, he brought with him the elders from surrounding family compounds who examined the
    Haggadah and consulted in a Makassae so animated that I could not understand. Soon
    Nanaie approached me, and with a twinkle and a smile that I had come to appreciate
    as a sign that my lessons were going well, he told me that I was to become the Makassae
    scribe. The elders had agreed that I should attend their marriage and mortuary rituals,
    record their myths and legends, and map their genealogy from Uru-Uato (Moon-Sun), their
    supreme (and only) deity, through generations of begats to Nanaeie and his only son.
    To do so was both a privilege and a sacred duty, since in Makassae ideology, it was taboo
    to speak the names of dead apart from a ritual offering. For that reason, Nanaie
    insisted, when the job was done, when he had determined that I had learned all that I
    needed to know, my questions would cease. And I would sacrifice a ram "whose horns
    turned twice," at the ancestral burial grounds by Uru-Uatos house, thereby
    secreting once again the names of the dead. 
     
    The next five months were a rapture of learning. My camera, my tape recorder, my diary and
    I attended births, marriages and funerals. Occasionally, we were guests at the umu gini,
    the thirty-year after death dispatch of the soul of the departed to the land of the
    ancestors high on Mate Bian mountain. At the center of each of these rituals was the
    sacrifice of an animal and an offering of rice brought as a gift for that purpose, always
    accompanied by a communal meal. I diligently transcribed my tapes, annotated my
    descriptions and stretched my genealogies across pieces of tracing paper that side by side
    extended across our small living quarters. One day, when I spotted a woman leading a goat
    to a neighboring hamlet, I explained to Nanaie her relationship to the family of the
    dead man she was going to honor and why the gift had to be made. I described the intimate
    relationship between life and death, production and reproduction, that is the essence of
    Makassae belief, ritual and everyday conduct. I unfolded my genealogical charts and traced
    for him the lineal connection between that woman and the dead mans family, all the
    way back to Uru-Uato. And he told me to stop, that I knew what I needed to know, and my
    questions had become taboo.  
     
    A week later, we sacrificed my ram and the names were secreted again. I returned to
    simpler pursuits, studying the layout of rice fields and yam gardens, honing my Makassae
    and teaching Nanaies son how to extend his simple reading knowledge of
    Portuguese to my phonetic rendering of the Makassae ritual language.  
     
    By November, the politics of East Timor were heating up, and we decided that it was best
    to take our two small children home. We packed our belongings, with special attention to
    my notebooks and tapes, and returned--after a stay in Lisbon--to Michigan, from where I
    had taken leave as a professor of anthropology. Life became routine, teaching and writing.
    I began a book about the Makassae and wrote several articles about their way of life and
    the belief system that guided it. I began to put in order the materials that I immodestly
    hoped could become the Makassae Haggadah.  
     
    But, perhaps foolishly, I suspended all that after the Indonesians invaded East Timor.
    Mate Bian, the last region to be pacified by the Portuguese, also became the center of
    East Timorese resistance. As a result, it bore the brunt of intense fighting beyond the
    terror that all of East Timor experienced. The last communication I had with Nanaie
    early in 1976 was a mere two lines, written in the phonetic script of his son. "There
    is no food," he wrote. "We are all dying." We packed clothing and seed and
    sent them off. We appealed to the International Committee of the Red Cross for help. I
    wrote to our congressmen and our newspaper. I gave congressional testimony, talked to my
    students and to anyone who cared to listen to the terrible things that were befalling
    "my people." I did politics and set aside the Haggadah.  
     
    I was a quiet voice in a wilderness in which others howled. They are the heroic supporters
    of the East Timorese resistance and struggle for freedom. Jose Ramos Horta, Bishop Belo
    and a small group of faithful supporters and advocates have championed the UN-sanctioned
    right to East Timorese self-determination for 25 years, and with good result. With the
    publicity of the Nobel Peace Prize and the waning of strategic interests that marked
    Indonesian ascendancy during the Vietnam War, with the post-Cold War reassertion of human
    rights and democratic values, with the economic stresses and strains that made a corrupt
    Indonesia a less certain ally, and with the fall of Suharto, East Timor finally found
    itself on the international agenda. After years of cajoling, the UN managed to broker an
    agreement between the Portuguese and Indonesian governments for a referendum in East Timor
    on an offer of extended autonomy within Indonesia. If the East Timorese rejected the
    offer, East Timor could go free, promised Suhartos successor, B.J. Habibie.  
     
    We know the rest, because the media is finally paying attention. On August 30, the people
    of East Timor, despite extreme efforts at intimidation by ragtag militias armed and
    instigated by the Indonesian military, exercised their right of free choice for the first
    time in nearly 500 years. Ninety-eight percent of registered voters turned out, under the
    watchful eyes of hundreds of UN volunteer election observers and un-armed international
    police , to cast a 78.5 percent vote against autonomy and for independence. UN
    Secretary-General Kofi Annan, President Clinton and Secretary of State Albright hailed
    "the birth of a new nation" and pledged full support to a UN transitional
    authority that would help guide East Timor to independence.  
     
    The East Timorese had no time for celebration. Within a day, reinforced militias appeared
    on the streets of Dili, the territorial capital, and in villages and family compounds
    throughout the countryside, terrorizing and killing independence supporters, including the
    elderly, women and children. UN workers recruited from among the local population were
    particular targets, and then expatriate UN workers and journalists as well. Successful in
    driving foreign observers from the countryside and from Dili itself, they attacked and
    burned the home of Bishop Belo, now in exile in Darwin, Australia, and systematically
    turned their attention on churches, nuns and priests. Refugee camps and ultimately UN
    headquarters themselves were not spared, even under the gaze of Indonesian soldiers and
    police who, despite their protection mandate, participated first indirectly and then
    directly in the assaults. As I write this, thousands are dead, tens of thousands are in
    hiding in the mountains, and as many as two hundred thousand East Timorese have been
    herded into exile elsewhere in Indonesia. Dili is virtually destroyed, and there is no one
    to bear witness to the butchery that is occurring elsewhere on the island. 
     
    The world must not stand idly by while this happens. No one saw the East Timor killing
    fields 25 years ago, and no one said: "Never again!" We were complacent before
    in face of the murder of a third of the East Timorese people. We must not be again. In
    this season of Jewish renewal, we must recall our own history and its coincidence with the
    history of every oppressed people. We must bear witness to what is occurring and insist
    that our government fulfill its promise that those East Timorese who survive will be able
    to return and build their nation. And I must return to the Makassae Haggadah to help them
    celebrate their suffering and recovery and share it from generation to generation.  
      
              
       
     
    To join the conversation at Jewish Public Forum Talk, click here.
    To access the Jewish Public
    Forum Archive, click here. 
    To receive Jewish Public Forum columns by email on a regular basis, complete the box
    below:
    
     
      
  |